Физическая корректность представления знаний и алгоритмическая сложность описания робастных моделей объектов управления. Ч. 1.
Основное содержимое статьи
Аннотация
Рассмотрены особенности и приведены оценки влияния множества неклассических логикофизических ограничений и информационных границ на эффективность разработки корректной математической модели, представляющей качественное описание динамического поведения нелинейного объекта управления. Описаны факторы, влияющие на полноту знаний (извлекаемых из физического эксперимента или математической модели) и на алгоритмическую сложность разрабатываемой модели объекта управления.
Скачивания
Информация о статье
Библиографические ссылки
Blencowe M. Quantum electromechanical systems // Physics Reports. – 2004. – Vol. 395. – №. 2. – Pp. 159-222.
Shapiro M., Brumer P. Quantum control of bound and continuum state dynamics // Physics Reports. – 2006. – Vol. 425. – №. 2. – Pp. 195-264.
Borzı A., Stadler G., Hohenester U. Optimal quantum control in nanostructures: Theory and application to a generic three-level system // Physical Review. – 2002. – Vol. A66. – № 5.
Петров Б.Н., Уланов Г.М., Ульянов С.В. Теория моделей процессов управления: Информационные и термодинамические аспекты. – М.: Наука. – 1978.
Гольденблат И.И., Ульянов С.В. Введение в теорию относительности и ее приложения в новой технике. – М.: Физматгиз. – 1979.
Петров Б.Н., Уланов Г.М., Ульянов С.В. Проблемы управления релятивистскими и квантовыми динамическими системами: Информационные и термодинамические аспекты. – М.: Наука. – 1982.
Ульянов С.В. Физические модели интеллектуальных процессов управления: Квантовые, релятивистские и информационно-термодинамические аспекты. Автореф. диссерт. на соиск. учен. степ. д.ф.-м.н. – М.: ИФТП АН СССР. – 1992.
Фрадков А.Л. О применении кибернетических методов в физике // УФН. – 2005. – Т. 175. – № 2. – С. 113-138.
Ulyanov S.V., Litvintseva L.V., Ulyanov I.S. et all. Quantum information and quantum computational intelligence: Quantum feedback control models – Physical limits, information bounds, and informationdisturbance trade-off. Note del Polo Ricerca. Milano: Universita degli Studi di MilanoPubl (http://www.qcoptimizer.com/). – 2006. – Vol. 81.
Ulyanov S.V., Litvintseva L.V., Ulyanov I.S. et all. Quantum information and quantum computational intelligence: Quantum optimal control and filtering – Stability, robustness, and self-organization models in nanotechnologies. – Note del Polo Ricerca. Milano: Universita degli Studi di Milano Publ (http://www.qcoptimizer.com/). – 2007. – Vol. 82.
Nielsen M.A., Chuang I.L. Quantum computation and quantum information. – Cambridge: University Press. – 2000.
Ulyanov S.V., Litvintseva L.V., Ulyanov S.S. Quantum information and quantum computational intelligence: Quantum probability, physics of quantum information and information geometry, quantum computational logic and quantum complexity – Note del Polo Ricerca. Milano: Universita degli Studi di Milano Publ (http://www.qcoptimizer.com/). – 2005. – Vol. 83.
Benenti G., Casati G., Strini G. Principles of quantum computation and information. – Singapore: World Scientific. – 2004. – Vol. I. – 2007. – Vol. II.
Janzing D. Computer science approach to quantum control. – Habilitation: Univ. Karlsruhe (TH) Publ. Germany. – 2006.
Красовский А.А. Проблемы физической теории управления. // А и Т. – 1990. – № 11.
Бутковский А.Г., Самойленко Ю.И. Управление квантовыми системами. –М.: Физматгиз, 1984.
Krotov V.F. The quantization property of probability distributions of the characteristics of dynamic systems observed in the presence of random disturbances // Automation and Remote Control. – 2003. – Vol. 64. – № 1. – Pp. 76-94.
Петров С.П., Мишин А.А., Ульянов С.В. Применение оптимизатора баз знаний для проектирования интеллектуальных систем управления в среде MATLAB/SIMULINK. Ч.1. // Системный анализ в науке и образовании: электрон. науч. журнал. – 2011. – №3. – [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http:/www.sanse.ru/archive/21.
Мишин А. А., Нефедов Н. Ю., Петров С. П., Полунин А. С., Литвинцева Л. В. Методы построения баз знаний для управления нелинейными динамическими системами // Системный анализ в науке и образовании: электрон. науч. журнал. – 2011. – №2. – [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http:/www.sanse.ru/archive/20. – 0421100111008.
Ульянов С. В., Тятюшкина О. Ю., Колбенко Е. В. Нечеткие модели интеллектуальных промышленных регуляторов и систем управления. Методология проектирования // Системный анализ в науке и образовании: электрон. науч. журнал. – 2011. – №2. – [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http:/www.sanse.ru/archive/20. – 0421100111009.
Ulyanov S.V., Litvintseva L.V., Ulyanov I.S. et all. Quantum information and quantum computational intelligence: Applied quantum soft computing in AI, computer science, quantum games and selforganization, informatics and design of intelligent wise robust control. – Note del Polo Ricerca. Milano: Universita degli Studi di Milano Publ (http://www.qcoptimizer.com/). – 2007. – Vol. 86.
Kurotani Y., Sagawa T., Ueda M. Upper bound on our knowledge about non-commuting observables for a qubit system // Phys. Review. – 2007. – Vol. A76. – № 2.
Sagawa T., Ueda M. The second law of thermodynamics with discrete quantum feedback control // Phys. Rev. Lett. – 2008. – Vol. 100. – № 8. – P. 080403.
Wehner S., Winter A. Higher entropic uncertainty relations for anti-commuting observables // arXiv: 0710.1185v1 [quant-ph]. – 2007.
Chakrabarti R., Rabitz H. Quantum control landscapes // Intern. Reviews in Physical Chemistry. – 2007. – Vol. 26. – № 4.
Tesch C.M., Kurtz L., de Vivie-Riedle R. Applying optimal control theory for elements of quantum computation in molecular systems // Chemical Physics Letters. – 2001. – Vol. 343. – № 5/6. – Pp. 633-641.
Babikov D. Accuracy of gates in a quantum computer based on vibrational eigenstates // J. of Chemical Physics. – 2004. – Vol. 121. – № 16.
Troppmann U., de Vivie-Riedle R. Mechanisms of local and global molecular quantum gates and their implementation prospects // J. of Chemical Physics. – 2005. – Vol. 122. – № 15.
Grace M., Brif C., Rabitz H. et all. Optimal control of quantum gates and suppression of decoherence in a system of interacting two-level particles // J. of Physics. – 2007. – Vol. B40. – № 9.
Werschik J., Gross E.K.U. Quantum optimal control theory // J. of Physics. – 2007. – Vol. B40. – № 18.
D’Alessandro D. Introduction to quantum control and dynamics. – CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. – 2007.
Correa A.A., Reboredo F.A., Balseiro C.A. Quantum corral wave-function engineering // Physical Review. – 2005. – Vol. B71. – № 3.
Hohenester U. Quantum control of polaron states in semiconductor quantum dots // J. of Physics. – 2007. – Vol. B40. – № 11.
Stepanyuk V.S., Negulyaev N.N., Niebergall L. et all. Effect of quantum confinement of surface electrons on adatom–adatom interactions // New Journal of Physics. – 2007. – Vol. 9. – № 338. – Pp. 1-15.
Eigler D. M., Lutz C. P., Crommie M. F. Information transport and computation in nanometre-scale structures // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. – 2004. – Vol. A362. – № 1819. – Pp. 1135-1147.
Snijders P. C., Moon E. J., González C., et all. Controlled self-organization of atom vacancies in monatomic gallium layers // Physical Review Letters. – 2007. – Vol. 99. – № 11. – P. 116102.
Yannouleas C., Landman U. Symmetry breaking and quantum correlations in finite systems: Studies of quantum dots and ultracold Bose gases and related nuclear and chemical methods // Reports on Progress in Physics. – 2007. – Vol. 70. – № 12. – Pp. 2067-2148.
Ulyanov S.V., Kurawaki I., Litvintseva L.V. et all. Soft computing simulation design of intelligent control systems in micro-nano-robotics and mechatronics // Soft Computing: A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications. – 2000. – Vol. 4. – № 2.
Cacir B., Ozmen A., Atav U. et all. Investigation of electronic structure of quantum dot using Slatertype orbitals and quantum genetic algorithm // Intern. J. of Modern Physics. – 2007. – Vol. 18. – № 1. – Pp. 61-72.
Judson R.S., Rabitz H. Teaching lasers to control molecules // Physical Review Letters. – 1992. – Vol. 68. – № 10.
Pearson B. J., White J. L., Weinacht T. C. et all. Coherent control using adaptive learning algorithms // Physical Review. – 2001. – Vol. A63. – № 6.
Levis R.J., Rabitz H. Closing the loop on bond selective chemistry using tailored strong field laser pulses // J. Phys. Chem. – 2002. – Vol. A106. – № 27.
Zhu W., Rabitz H. Attaining optimal controls for manipulating quantum systems // Intern. J. of Quantum Chemistry. – 2003. – Vol. 83. – № 1.
Cavalcanti A., Freitas R.A. Jr. Nanorobotics control design: A collective behavior approach for medicine // IEEE Trans. on Nanobioscience. – 2005. – Vol. 4. – № 2.
Ulyanov S.V., Yamafuji K., Fukuda T. et all. Modelling of micro-nano-robots and physical limit of micro control // J. of the Robotics Society of Japan. – 1996. – Vol. 14. – № 8. – Pp. 1102-1105.
Meyer D.A. Quantum strategies // Physics Review Letters. – 1999. – Vol. 82, – № 5. – Pp. 1052-1055.
Eisert J., Wilkens M., Lewenstein M. Quantum games and quantum strategies // Physics Review Letters. – 1999. – Vol. 83. – № 15. – Pp. 3077-3088.
Grib A. A., Parfionov G. N. Can a game be quantum? // J. of Mathematical Sciences. – 2005. – Vol. 125. – № 2.
Aharon N., Vaidman L. Quantum advantages in classically defined task // Phys. Review. – 2008. – Vol. A77. – № 5. – P. 052310.
Ulyanov S.V., Litvintseva L.V., Ulyanov S.S. et all. Computational intelligence with quantum game’s approach and robust decision-making in communication information uncertainty // Proc. of Intern. Conf. on Computational Intelligence, ICCI’2004. (Nicosis, North Cyprus). – 2004. – Pp. 172-187.
Aerts D., Czachor M. Quantum aspects of semantic analysis and symbolic artificial intelligence // J. of Physics. – 2004. – Vol. A37. – P. L123-L132.
Aerts D. Quantum interference and superposition in cognition: Development of a theory for the disjunction of concepts // arXiv: [physics-gen-ph] 0705.0975v. – 17 May 2007.
Chen J.C.H. Quantum computation and natural language processing // Ph.D. Thesis. – Univ. Hamburg Publ. – 2002.
Sadrzadeh M. High level quantum structures in linguistic and multi agent systems // Univ. of Southampton Publ. Amer. Association for AI (www.aaai.org). – 2007.
Laskey K.B. Quantum physical symbol systems // J. of Logic, Language and Information. – 2006. – Vol. 15. – № 1/2. – Pp. 109-154.
Benioff P. Use of mathematical logical concepts in quantum mechanics: An example // J. of Physics. – 2002. – Vol. A35. – Pp. 5843-5857.
Benioff P. Language is physical // Quantum Information Processing. – 2002. – Vol. 1. – № 6.
Hartle J.B. Quantum physics and human language // J. of Physics. – 2007. – Vol. A40. – Pp. 3101-3121.
Pang C.-Y. Zhou Z.-W., Guo G.-C. A hybrid quantum encoding algorithm of vector quantization for image compression // Chinese Physics. – 2006. – Vol. 15. – № 12.
Ferreira A., Sharma G., Mavroidis C. New trends in bio-nanorobotics using virtual reality technologies // Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Intern. Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. (June 29 - July 3, Hong Kong and Macau). – 2005. – Pp. 89-94.
Wegrzni S., Klamka J., Znamirowski L. et all. Nano and quantum systems of informatics // Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Ser. Technical Sciences. – 2004. – Vol. 52. – № 1.
Furia C.A. Quantum informatics: A survey // Calif. Inst. Techn. Publ. – 2006. – [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://home.dei.polimi.it/furia/publs/quantuminformatics06.pdf.
Schaller G., Schützhold R. Quantum algorithm for optical-template recognition with noise filtering // Physical Review. – 2006. – Vol. A74. – № 1.
Perus M., Bischof H., Loo C.K. Quantum-implementable selective reconstruction of high-resolution images // Applied Optics. – 2004. – Vol. 43. – № 33.
Jozsa R. Quantum effects in algorithms // Proc. 1st International Conference on Quantum Computation and Quantum Communication. – Palm Springs. February 1998. – [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://xxx.lanl.gov/ps/quant-ph/9805086.
Svore K.M., Aho A.V., Chuang I. et all. A layered software architecture for quantum computing design tools // Computer. – 2006. – Vol. 39. – № 1. Pp. 74-83.
Litvintseva L.V., Ulyanov S.V. Design of self-organized intelligent control systems based on quantum fuzzy inference: Intelligent system of systems engineering approach // IEEE Intern. Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 2005. (Hawaii, USA, 10-12 Oct. 2005). – Vol. 4. – Pp. 3835-3840.
Litvintseva L.V., Ulyanov S.V, Ulyanov S.S. Quantum fuzzy inference for knowledge base design in robust intelligent controllers // J. of Comp. and Systems Sci. Intern. – 2007. – Vol. 46. – № 6.
Yukalov V.I., Sornette D. Quantum decision theory as quantum theory of measurement // Physics Letters. – 2008. – Vol. A372. – Pp. 6867-6871.
Styer D.F., Balkin M.S., Becker K.M. et all. Nine formulation of quantum mechanics // Am. J. Phys. –2002. – Vol. 70. – № 6. – Pp. 288-297.
Passon O. How to teach quantum mechanics // Eur. J. Phys. – 2004. – Vol. 25. – № 4. – Pp. 765-769.
Grau B.C. How to teach basic quantum mechanics to computer scientists and electrical engineers // IEEE Trans. Educations. – 2004. – Vol. 26. – № 1. – Pp. 1-7.
Flores E., Osler T.J. The tautochrone under arbitrary potentials using fractional calculus // Am. J. Phys. – 1999. – Vol. 67. – № 8. – Pp. 718-722.
Haws L., Kiser T. Exploring the brachistochrone problem // Amer. Math. Monthly. – 1995. – Vol. 102. – № 4. – Pp. 328-336.
Gemmer J.A., Nolan M., Umble R. Generalizations of the brachistochrone problem // arXiv: 0612152v2 [math-ph]. – 27 Jan 2009.
Gemmer J.A. Generalization of the brachistochrone problem. A Senior Thesis. Millersville Univ. – 2006. 32P.
Goldstein H.F., Bender C.M. Relativistic brachistochrone // J. Math. Phys. – 1986. – Vol. 27. – № 2. – Pp. 507-511.
Scarpello G. M., Ritelli D. Relativistic brachistochrone under electric or gravitational uniform field // Z. Angew. Math. Mech. (ZAMM). – 2006. – Vol. 86. – № 9. – Pp. 736-743.
Kamath S.G., Sreedhar V.V. Classical radiation from relativistic charge accelerated along a brachistochrone // Phys. Review. – 1987. – Vol. 36. – № 5. – Pp. 2478-2481.
Kamath S.G. Relativistic tautochrone // J. Math. Phys. – 1992. – Vol. 33. – № 3. – Pp. 934-940.